Accounts Receivable (AR) Management
An outsourced receivables function covering invoice delivery, structured follow-up, dispute management and cash application. You get…
Finance & Accounting Operations
Invoices matched, approved and paid on terms, with duplicates stopped before payment.
An outsourced payables function covering invoice capture, three-way matching, exception handling, GST and TDS validation and payment run preparation. We prepare and control; your authorised signatories release the funds.
Indicative fee from
Indicative monthly fee for up to 400 vendor invoices per month for a single entity with a standard approval workflow. Final fee is confirmed after a volume, workflow and vendor master assessment. Vendor master clean-up and historical duplicate review are quoted separately.
Request ConsultationPrefer to talk first? Call +91 7303967800 or message us on WhatsApp.
Accounts payable rarely fails loudly. It fails as a set of small, recurring costs that never appear as a line item. A supplier invoice sits in an individual mailbox for three weeks and is booked in the wrong period, so the month-end liability is understated. The same invoice is submitted twice, once by email and once with the delivery challan, and is paid twice, and the second payment is discovered a year later during a vendor statement reconciliation, if at all. An early-settlement discount lapses because nobody sequenced the payment run against it. Input tax credit is claimed on an invoice that never appeared in GSTR-2B, and the reversal with interest arrives later.
Two exposures deserve particular attention in the Indian context. The first is Section 43B(h) of the Income-tax Act, which disallows a deduction for amounts payable to a micro or small enterprise registered under the MSMED Act 2006 where payment is not made within the statutory period, with the deduction deferred to the year of actual payment. That converts a routine payables delay into a current-year tax cost, and it requires the vendor master to identify MSME status correctly in the first place. The second is payment fraud. Vendor bank detail change requests arriving by email, often impersonating a genuine supplier, remain one of the most effective attacks on finance functions, and the control that stops them is procedural rather than technical.
Invoices are captured into a single controlled intake rather than into personal mailboxes, then validated for statutory particulars, purchase order reference, tax treatment and duplicate risk. Three-way matching runs across purchase order, goods receipt note and invoice for goods, with two-way matching against approved service acceptance where no receipt exists, applied within tolerance rules you set. Exceptions are held and routed to a named owner rather than pushed through to keep a payment run on schedule, because a matching exception that is approved to save time is precisely how leakage occurs. Duplicate detection runs beyond exact-match logic to catch transposed invoice numbers, alternate vendor codes for the same entity, and same-value same-date submissions across different channels. Tax validation covers GST classification, reverse charge identification, and TDS section and rate mapping including the interaction between section 194Q and section 206C(1H). GSTR-2B is matched against the purchase register each period so credit exposure is known before the return is filed rather than after.
We prepare payment runs; we do not release them. The payment proposal is assembled against due dates, agreed terms, available discounts, MSME statutory deadlines and cash availability, with supporting documentation attached for each line, and it goes to your authorised signatories for release under your delegation of authority. Vendor master changes, particularly bank detail changes, follow a defined verification procedure requiring independent confirmation on a previously recorded contact rather than on the contact details supplied with the request. That separation of preparation from authorisation is deliberate, and we will not accept a scope that removes it.
The function runs remotely inside your accounting or ERP environment with role-restricted access, on a fixed weekly and monthly calendar. Vendor queries are handled through a shared payables inbox with defined response expectations, which removes a persistent interruption load from your finance team. Month-end close support covers accrual identification for goods received but not invoiced, goods receipt and invoice receipt clearing account analysis, and vendor statement reconciliation. Personal and vendor data is processed under documented arrangements consistent with your obligations under the DPDP Act 2023.
Companies whose vendor volume has outgrown informal approval by email. Multi-location businesses where invoices arrive at sites rather than at head office. Groups needing consistent payables control across entities. Finance teams under audit or diligence scrutiny on unrecorded liabilities, MSME compliance or input tax credit.
Monthly retainer · Per-invoice transaction pricing · Fixed fee vendor master clean-up project
Transition runs three to six weeks, covering the control review, vendor master clean-up and workflow setup before the process goes live. Once operating, invoices are typically validated and matched within one to two working days of receipt, with exceptions raised the same day. Payment runs follow your calendar, most commonly weekly or fortnightly. Timelines extend where the vendor master requires substantial remediation or where approvals are distributed across multiple sites.
The payment proposal for each cycle, sequenced by due date, terms and discount opportunity, with matched supporting documentation per line, ready for your signatories to authorise.
Payables ageing by bucket and vendor, days payable outstanding, discounts captured and forgone, and invoices held in exception, reported monthly against the opening baseline.
Every invoice held for a matching, tax or documentation exception, with reason, value, assigned approver and age, so nothing sits in limbo without a visible owner.
Flagged potential duplicate submissions and payments with the matching logic that surfaced each one, and the disposition applied after review.
Findings on duplicate records, incomplete tax registration data, dormant vendors, missing MSME status and bank detail changes made during the period, with remediation actions.
GSTR-2B against purchase register matching output with categorised mismatches and supplier follow-up lists, alongside the TDS deduction summary by section for return preparation.
Vendor-wise ageing against MSMED Act timelines with the invoices approaching or past the statutory window, and the resulting Section 43B(h) disallowance exposure quantified.
We map how invoices currently arrive, who approves what, where the matching evidence lives and where the control gaps sit. Vendor master data, open payables ageing and MSME status coverage are assessed. The phase closes with a findings note and a proposed workflow.
Approval hierarchy, delegation of authority limits, matching tolerances, exception routing, payment calendar and vendor onboarding requirements are agreed with your controller. Bank detail change verification procedure is documented explicitly. Nothing goes live until the authority matrix is signed.
Duplicate records are merged, tax registration and MSME status are completed, dormant vendors are deactivated and bank details are verified through the new procedure. Access is provisioned and the intake channel goes live, with a parallel run while the transition settles.
Invoices are captured, validated, matched and coded to the agreed calendar. Exceptions are routed to named approvers with the evidence attached, and duplicate detection runs before each payment cycle rather than after. Vendor queries are handled through the shared inbox.
The payment proposal is assembled against due dates, discounts, MSME deadlines and cash position, with documentation attached per line. It goes to your authorised signatories, who release the funds. We never hold payment authorisation rights.
At close we support accrual identification, clearing account analysis and vendor statement reconciliation. A periodic review covers ageing, discounts forgone, exception volumes, duplicate findings and MSME exposure, with process fixes proposed for whatever keeps recurring.
Detection runs before the payment file is prepared rather than during a later reconciliation, which is the difference between preventing an outflow and attempting to recover one.
MSME payment tracking against statutory deadlines protects deductibility under Section 43B(h), removing a year-end tax cost that is entirely avoidable with visibility.
Matching GSTR-2B to the purchase register each period surfaces credit at risk while supplier correction is still achievable, instead of at annual return preparation.
Controlled intake and accrual review mean goods received but not invoiced is quantified rather than discovered, which removes a recurring audit finding on unrecorded liabilities.
Bank detail changes require independent verification on previously recorded contacts, which blocks the impersonation route that fraudulent vendor change requests depend on.
A managed payables inbox with defined response expectations absorbs the interruption load, while suppliers get consistent answers about invoice and payment status.
No, and we would decline a scope that required it. We prepare the payment run with supporting documentation attached per line, and your authorised signatories release funds under your delegation of authority. Preparation and authorisation must sit with different parties; that separation is the primary control protecting a payables function, and outsourcing should strengthen it rather than dissolve it. Where a client wants operational convenience, the practical answer is a well-structured proposal file and a maker-checker approval workflow inside your banking platform, not shared credentials.
Exact matching on vendor, invoice number and amount catches the obvious cases and misses most real ones. The duplicates that get paid are the ones where the invoice number was entered with a transposition or a different prefix, where the same supplier exists twice in the vendor master under slightly different names, where a scanned copy is submitted after the original, or where the same amount and date appears through a different channel. Detection therefore runs on fuzzy invoice number matching, vendor entity grouping across codes, and same-value same-period screening, and it runs before the payment file is prepared rather than during a later reconciliation.
It starts in the vendor master. MSME registration status has to be captured and periodically refreshed from vendor declarations and Udyam registration details, because an incorrect classification defeats the control regardless of how good the payment discipline is. Each qualifying invoice is then aged against the statutory payment window, and vendors approaching the deadline are prioritised in the payment run. Reporting quantifies invoices past the window and the resulting deduction disallowance exposure ahead of year end rather than at assessment. This is process support, not a tax opinion; specific positions should be confirmed with your tax adviser.
The mismatch is categorised and pursued rather than absorbed. The common causes are a supplier who has not filed, a supplier who filed against a wrong GST identification number, a value or tax mismatch, or a timing difference across periods, and each requires a different response. We run the match each period, issue supplier-wise follow-up lists, and report the credit at risk with its ageing so a decision on claiming or deferring can be taken with evidence. Catching this monthly matters, because a supplier is far more likely to correct a recent filing than one from three quarters ago.
We work inside your existing environment with role-restricted access rather than introducing a parallel system. That commonly means SAP, Oracle NetSuite, Microsoft Dynamics, Odoo, Tally, Zoho Books, QuickBooks or Xero, along with any invoice capture or workflow tool already licensed. Where no workflow tool exists, we can operate a structured intake and approval process using controlled shared storage and defined logging, which is adequate at moderate volume. During the control review we confirm what roles can be provisioned, since some deployments restrict external access and the process is designed around that constraint.
Section and rate mapping is applied at invoice validation, using vendor category, the nature of the payment and the applicable threshold, with cumulative threshold monitoring across the year so a deduction obligation is not missed on the invoice that crosses the limit. Lower or nil deduction certificates are recorded against the vendor with their validity period and applied automatically until expiry. Where sections 194Q and 206C(1H) both potentially apply on a transaction, the position is determined and documented rather than left to the person entering the invoice. The deduction summary supports your return preparation.
Three to six weeks is typical from access provisioning to going live. The variable is almost always vendor master condition. Where duplicate records, missing tax registration details and absent MSME status have to be remediated first, that work sits on the critical path, because a payables process built on unreliable vendor data will reproduce the same errors faster. We run a parallel period during transition so your team retains visibility while the workflow settles, and existing open items are triaged into the new process rather than being left in a legacy queue.
We do, through a shared payables inbox operating with defined response expectations. Suppliers get consistent answers on invoice receipt, matching status, exception reasons and expected payment date, which removes a substantial and unpredictable interruption load from your finance team. Anything requiring a commercial decision, such as a disputed price, a contract interpretation or a request to accelerate payment outside terms, is escalated to your named owner with the full history attached. We do not make commitments to suppliers on payment timing that fall outside the agreed calendar.
Related engagements
An outsourced receivables function covering invoice delivery, structured follow-up, dispute management and cash application. You get…
Recurring reconciliation of bank accounts, sub-ledgers, intercompany balances, GST returns and settlement files, run to a…
Technical accounting support for companies facing an Ind AS or IFRS transition, a difficult audit, a…
A senior finance function delivered on retainer: rolling three-way forecasts, a monthly MIS and board pack,…
Tell us the specifics. We will confirm whether this is the right engagement, what it would cost, and how long it would take.